HowManyFPS Desktop App v1.25.3Track Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

FX-8320 vs Core i5-14400F

The FX-8320 is much slower than the Core i5-14400F on average across 100+ games and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $126.19 cheaper!

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

$73.76View CPUAll CPUs

Up to 16% cheaper – $73.76 vs $199.95

CPU

$199.95View CPUAll CPUs

Up to 207% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 11 years and 4 months newer
Up to 165% better value for money
Up to 16% more expensive – $199.95 vs $73.76

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

Dota 22013

FX-8320

169FPS

Core i5-14400F

252FPS

League of Legends2009

FX-8320

123FPS

Core i5-14400F

338FPS

Grand Theft Auto V2013

FX-8320

185FPS

Core i5-14400F

218FPS

Escape From Tarkov2017

FX-8320

208FPS

Core i5-14400F

246FPS

Overwatch 22023

525FPS

551FPS

367FPS

676FPS

Valorant2020

FX-8320

539FPS

Core i5-14400F

710FPS

Apex Legends2019

FX-8320

378FPS

Core i5-14400F

378FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

FX-8320

Core i5-14400F

54%

Core i5-14400F ranks 50 points higher.

Coreshelp

FX-8320

Core i5-14400F

Core i5-14400F has 2 more cores.

Threadshelp

FX-8320

Core i5-14400F

Core i5-14400F has 8 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

FX-8320

8 MB

Core i5-14400F

20 MB

Core i5-14400F has 12 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

FX-8320

3.5 GHz

Core i5-14400F

2.5 GHz

FX-8320 has a 40% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

FX-8320

4 GHz

Core i5-14400F

4.7 GHz

Core i5-14400F boosts 18% higher.

TDPhelp

FX-8320

125W

Core i5-14400F

65W

Core i5-14400F draws 60W less power.

Pricehelp

FX-8320

$73.76

Core i5-14400F

$199.95

FX-8320 is $126.19 cheaper.

FX-8320Core i5-14400F

AM3+

Sockethelp

LGA1700

Vishera

Codenamehelp

Raptor Lake-R

Desktop

Segmenthelp

Desktop

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Integrated GPUhelp

No Integrated Graphics

DDR3

RAMhelp

3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5)

Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, FX-8320 or Core i5-14400F?expand_more

The Core i5-14400F. It's 1250% faster than the FX-8320 on average across 100+ games, scoring 54/100 vs 4/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core i5-14400F than FX-8320?expand_more

1250% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, FX-8320 or Core i5-14400F?expand_more

The Core i5-14400F is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core i5-14400F worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 54/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between FX-8320 and Core i5-14400F?expand_more

Performance: FX-8320 scores 4/100, Core i5-14400F scores 54/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the FX-8320 or Core i5-14400F bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the FX-8320 or Core i5-14400F?expand_more

The Core i5-14400F is the stronger pick at 54/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.